Jump to Navigation

Enforcing the Platform

Preserving American Freedom > Restoring Integrity to Our Elections > Enforcing the Platform
The Republican State Chairman and county chairs are responsible for implementing this platform by requiring party candidates to indicate their positions on platform planks before their acceptance on the ticket and to make such information available on the Party website. The SREC should seriously consider candidates' positions on the Party platform before granting support.
(plank deleted)

The whole reason we have to "enforce" the platform is because it is so flawed.

Let's adopt a rational platform, and the problem will disappear.

And the idea of "enforcing"? Huh? Why would local voters care about the SREC's opinion of a candidate?

Fault:

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Random plank

Promoting Individual Freedom and Personal Safety > Individual Freedom > Right To Keep and Bear Arms
We support a fundamental right to bear arms. We oppose gun ownership monitoring and unusual taxation or regulation of guns and ammunition. We support stiff penalties for felonies committed with firearms. We believe the Texas Legislature should: - Allow concealed handgun license (CHL) holders to carry concealed weapons in colleges and universities. - Prevent employers from prohibiting CHL holders from storing their concealed handgun in their vehicle. - Protect property owners who allow concealed weapons from civil liability.We urge the Legislature and Congress to repeal all laws that infringe on the right to bear arms, and to reject any monitoring of gun ownership, and all excessive taxation or regulation of guns and ammunition. We support a ten-year minimum mandatory sentence without parole for felonies committed with firearms. Stiff penalties should be enacted for frivolous lawsuits against legitimate firearms manufacturers. All gun owners are responsible for safely storing and operating firearms. We believe the Legislature should enact legislation: allowing: Concealed Handgun License holders to carry concealed weapons on publicly owned institutions of learning; and, preventing employers from prohibiting Concealed Handgun License holders from storing their concealed handgun in their vehicle while on a company parking area, and removing civil liability from property owners who do not prevent Concealed Handgun License holders from carrying on their premises. We believe that FFL holders should be free from harassment, and license revocations and denials against firearm dealers based on violations consisting of largely inconsequential recordkeeping errors and encourages the ATF to consider lesser gradation of sanctions for such errors.
Reason:

Frivolous lawsuits are a general tort reform measure and do not belong here. That notwithstanding, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was signed by President Bush in 2005.

"All gun owners are responsible for safely storing and operating firearms." This is a common sense, obvious statement that does not belong in a platform.

The idea that a person should be free from harrassment and not inundated by red tape is a general issue of proper governance and is not unique to firearms-related issues.

accomplished, wordy, misuse of platform

Problems

Show problem parts of the platform:
Platforms promote principles and policies. Planks must not push particular polymorphic political proposals, including bills.about a specific bill (6)
Parts of these were recently implemented.accomplished (11)
Parts of these only promote limited religious viewpoints.advances religious doctrine (8)
Too many positions already overwhelm voters. We cannot add more without a plan to cut ballot complexity.another elected office (6)
The GOP should not be a virulent, anti-homosexual crusade.anti-homosexual crusade (6)
These destroy useful customs or start us down slippery slopes.bad precedent (17)
Cliches belong on the playground, not in serious platforms.cliche (5)
These contradict other planks.contradictory (13)
These simply go too far, overshooting a rational remedy.extreme (25)
These have factual errors.incorrect (11)
These planks advanced contemporary liberal causes or expand government.leftist (22)
These planks require belief in something that is untrue.misinformed (18)
These are not appropriate for a platform document.misuse of platform (6)
These planks have minor punctuation or grammatical errors.needs copyedit (8)
These problems were fixed before the 2008 platform was published.no longer relevant (3)
"Black helicopters" and paranoid conspiracy have no place in our party.paranoid (15)
Parts of these do nothing useful.pointless (61)
These proposals would make our kids stupider.reduces education quality (3)
These planks are internally redundant or repeat other parts of the platform.redundant (41)
These planks should propose a more general solution.too specific (6)
These planks are unclear or unfocused.vague (19)
Puffy prose, hackneyed phrases, and obscure words create pinheaded, unfocused, and inaccessible platforms. Platforms must be simple and direct.wordy (47)

Recent comments