Jump to Navigation

2008 Platform (filtered to vague)

This is a plank-by-plank review of the 2008 platform. Use the links at right to narrow it down, or explore alternate views:

Show:
original version
proposed changes
improved version
Showing only planks with vague fault: These planks are unclear or unfocused. (show all planks)
Legend: text to be added text to be deleted

Emergency War Powers

Preserving American Freedom > Limiting the Expanse of Government Power > Emergency War Powers
We charge the President to cancel the state of national emergency and charge Congress to repeal the War Powers Act and end our declared state of emergency.
(plank deleted)

This is a paranoid and silly plank.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was enacted over a presidential veto. It reduces presidential powers that had grown under expansive Constitutional interpretation.

Repealing the War Powers Act would increase the president's power without strict Constitutional interpretation, which is has not been the judicial mood for decades.

The reference to "state of national emergency" is probably pulled from paranoid, tinfoil hat-type conspiracist ideas. Similar are the nutty theories that FEMA is poised to usurp the Constitution and take over the government. It is unclear exactly what state of emergency this plank is talking about.

Property Forfeiture

Preserving American Freedom > Limiting the Expanse of Government Power > Property Forfeiture
All proceeds from civil forfeiture must be deposited into Texas's general revenue fund. When a forfeiture is found invalid, the property's owner must be reimbursed for damage and all other costs associated with the loss of property.We support strengthening present restrictions on use of civil forfeiture laws and assessing penalties to reimburse injured parties for costs accrued if property is returned to its original owner.

Make it specific, and eliminate corrupt incentives for civil forfeiture: all proceeds must go to Texas's general fund. This removes temptation from marginally ethical jurisdictions.

Fault:

Residency Requirements

Preserving American Freedom > Restoring Integrity to Our Elections > Residency Requirements
We support legislation that determines residence in accordance with common-law rules, as recognized by the courts, except as otherwise provided by the Texas Election Code.
(plank deleted)

This is hopelessly vague.

Fault:

Conflicts of Interest

Preserving American Freedom > Restoring Integrity to Our Elections > Conflicts of Interest
We support limitations on elected or appointed officials' ability to regulate or vote on issues in the midst of a conflict of interest. We oppose such officials representing paying clients, other than the body to which they were elected, before any government agency.We support all legislation prohibiting influencing or voting of any elected official or appointee where a conflict of interest exists. No such official should represent paying clients before a state agency.

"Influence" is far too vague in this plank, and it can be proper for a knolwedgable party to advise on an issue even when ineligible to vote on it. Reworded to make more specific. Also, statute is not necessarily the best way to enact this.

Fault:

Governor's Veto

Preserving American Freedom > Restoring Integrity to Our Elections > Governor's Veto
We urge a Constitutional amendment permitting the Legislature to return for a three-day session in response to the governor's veto in the last 3 days of or after a regular or special legislative session.

Plank should clarify this is only for bills that were vetoed within a timeframe where it is difficult or impossble for the Legislature to consider a veto override.

Fault:

Filibuster

Preserving American Freedom > Restoring Integrity to Our Elections > Filibuster
We support return to the traditional Filibuster in the U.S. Senate.
(plank deleted)

This is vague and questionable. The U.S. Senate's filibuster has changed little in many decades.

Fault:

Symbols of American Heritage

Preserving American Freedom > Honoring the Symbols of Our American Heritage > Symbols of American Heritage
We call upon governmental entities to protect all symbols of our American heritage from being altered in any way.
(plank deleted)

This makes no sense.

Fault:

Support of Parental Authority

Strengthening Families, Protecting Life and Promoting Health > Protecting Our Children > Support of Parental Authority
We support parental authority and the teaching of moral values in the home. We oppose school-based clinics and/or youth impact centers located at, sponsored by, or funded by any state agency or public school district, whether or not they dispense condoms and contraceptives or refer, aid, or advise minors to have abortions.
(plank deleted)

This is redundant, outdated, and vague. Parental authority is covered elsewhere. Youth impact centers are part of a 1984 Dallas-area initiative; they appear to have gone away before 1995. It is unclear what "school-based clinics" means.

Child Care

Strengthening Families, Protecting Life and Promoting Health > Protecting Our Children > Child Care
We oppose any government regulations that will adversely affect the availability, affordability, or the right of parents to choose childcare.
(plank deleted)

In the abscence of a credible movement to restrict this right, this plank is hopelessly vague. Furthermore, this could be construed to recommend repeal of existing child care licensing laws.

Fault:

Competition in Healthcare

Strengthening Families, Protecting Life and Promoting Health > Empowering Families to Direct Their Health Care > Competition in Healthcare
Free market principles and competition shall be encouraged in health care, especially allowing each trained health care professional to practice to the extent of their education.

The second clause makes little sense.

Fault:

Parental Rights in Education

Educating Our Children > Parental Rights in Education
The right of parents to raise and educate their children is fundamental. Parents have the right to withdraw their child from any special or bilingual education program. We urge the Legislature to enact penalties for violation of parental rights.
(plank deleted)

The first sentence repeats earlier statements.

Parents have the right to withdraw children from special education as of December 2008.

"We urge the Legislature to enact penalties for violation of parental rights." is unacceptably vague.

 

Classroom Discipline

Educating Our Children > Classroom Discipline
We recommend that local school boards and classroom teachers be given more authority to deal with disciplinary problems. We urge the Legislature, Governor, Commissioner of Education and State Board of Education to remind administrators and school boards that corporal punishment is effective and legal in Texas.
(plank deleted)

The first sentence is vague. It is unclear what state-given authority teachers lack, and the Support for Classroom Teachers plank already calls for increased powers to deal with misbehaving students. Any lack of authority is a district-level policy or procedural problem.

Supposely the platform is for "maximizing" local control elsewhere, but yet we want the state to tell the districts what to do?

Social Promotion

Educating Our Children > Social Promotion
Students should master basic, minimumgrade-level skills before advancing to the next grade.

What are "basic, minimum skills"?

Fault:

Prison Reform

Promoting Individual Freedom and Personal Safety > Protecting Citizens From Crime > Prison Reform
We believe our prison systems should emphasize protection ofPrisons exist to protect society and punishment ofreform redeemable offenders, ever mindful of their human rights. The state should assist offenders who desire reform. Prisoners should be required to perform meaningful work. Prisoners should not have access to private information of any citizen. We support alternative methods of prison administration. We. We support prohibiting prisoners from initiating frivolous lawsuits. No extraordinary medical care, including organ transplants or body part replacement, should be performed on prisoners at taxpayer expense.

"Prisoners should not have access to private information of any citizen." and "We support alternative methods of prison administration." are hopelessly vague and unclear.

 

Fault:

Unfunded Mandates

Strengthening the Economy > Government Spending > Unfunded Mandates
We oppose all unfunded mandates by the federal and state governments including unreasonable requirements on voluntary emergency response personnel. State mandates without full funding should be included in the government body's annual increase spending limits.
(plank deleted)

The part about emergency response personnel makes this plank unfocused.

"State mandates without full funding should be included in the government body's annual increase spending limits." Huh?

Also, do we really oppose all unfunded mandates? For example, consider how the Texas Public Information Act mandates openness. This is an unfunded mandate that imposes compliance costs on jurisdictions, but it's an excellent practice.

Budget And Appropriations Process

Strengthening the Economy > Government Spending > Budget And Appropriations Process
We demand that Congress institute reforms that eliminate unethical politicization of appropriations. We oppose trading of votes based on pork sharing, and promises of financial and other help during reelection campaigns. We oppose state funding of programs without legislative approval.
(plank deleted)

"unethical politicization of appropriations" is hopelessly vague. Congress is a political body. It's natural for issues to be politicized.

"We oppose trading of votes based on pork sharing, and promises of financial and other help during reelection campaigns." is also unclear.

It is unclear how the state can can fund programs without legislative approval. Budgets come from the legislature. While the governor has an authority called the "budget executive authority," this is statutorily authorized (source) and has limited legislative review. Modern government is complex, and the governor must have some discretion outside the biennial legislature.

Overall this plank appears to have a naive take on the art of politics. It is not pretty, like sausage making.

Civil Defense

Restoring American Sovereignty and Leadership > Domestic > Civil Defense
We support a national and local civil defense system. We urge Congress to rescind all gun laws infringing upon our constitutional rights.
(plank deleted)

This plank's point is unclear. Civil defense is still alive. It has shifted away from responding to miliary attack and is now focused on natural and general disasters.

Gun laws are handled elsewhere.

Foreign Control of US Interests

Restoring American Sovereignty and Leadership > Domestic > Foreign Control of US Interests
We oppose sale, transfer, management or ownership of critical U.S. interests by foreign or international entities. Foreign owned properties and income shall be subject to all US laws.
(plank deleted)

This is vague without better definition of what constitutes "critical U.S. interests." Also, if we are going to play the free trade and globalization game, we cannot use different rules for ourselves.

Support of Our Armed Forces

Restoring American Sovereignty and Leadership > Domestic > Support of Our Armed Forces
We support the armed forces. We recommend modernizing and maintaining the equipment and weapons for the safety and effectiveness of our armed forces. While we support a continued policy of an overwhelmingly strong military, we also support fiscal sanity: we demand termination of wasteful or ineffective equipment and weapons programs. We demand that displaced military personnel have their votes counted. We support construction of a Texas veterans museum.We encourage all Americans to support the brave and patriotic men and women of our armed forces. They should be paid a wage sufficient to prevent them from ever needing food stamps and that encourages retention. We strongly recommend that all our armed forces remain commanded only by the Commander-in-Chief and his subordinate commanders; upgrading, modernizing and maintaining the equipment, weapons, and vehicles for the safety, efficiency and effectiveness of our armed forces; the continuation of the all volunteer armed forces, the recruitment and advancement of military personnel based on the needs of the military and the qualifications of the person; disqualification of homosexuals from military service; immediate discharge of HIV positive individuals; separation of men and women in basic training; exclusion of women from ground and submarine combat roles; provision of full military honors for burial of veterans; restoration of all veteran benefits without an offset for disability pay; health and disability benefits equal to active military for national guard and reserves; passage of a "new" G.I Bill that fully funds expanded educational scholarship opportunities for honorably separated Veterans; restoration of full lifetime health benefits to retired military and their families; and assurance that military and civilian voters displaced by their service be afforded full opportunity for their votes to be counted; and the expeditious construction of a Veterans Museum in Texas.

This is a terrible, unfocused plank that is a grab bag of random wishes and left-wing government expansionism.

Wages are an economic issue in every industry, including the military. If wages are too low, they will show up in poor recruitment and retention numbers. Given good recruiting numbers, there is little evidence of insufficient wages.

There is no credible movement to:

  • Reassign commandment of the armed forces away from the President.
  • Move away from a volunteer force.
  • Recruit to fill ranks with unqualified people.

The issue of women in combat roles is an internal issue for the military and does not deserve mention here. If it comes down to it, women may decline to serve in the military if they do not want a combat role.

These are in fact left-wing and remarkably expensive policies:

  • Removing disability pay offset: A lack of an offset for other disability pay is unfair: you collect twice for one disability!
  • Full health benefits for National Guard and reservists: U.S. health benefits are typically a function of employment. National Guard and reservists do not work when they are not on duty, so it makes little sense to extend health coverage to off-duty times.
  • Lifetime health benefits: Just like with any other employer-sponsored health plan, military health plan should terminate upon end of employment.

It is counterproductive and pointless to have a witch hunt for homosexuals.

There is zero evidence that the military is mishandling HIV.

Separation of men and women in basic training is counterproductive. They will have to work together in the field. Why create artificial barriers?

The G.I. Bill provision is accomplished. The current bill pays up to $47,556 in educational benefits over a maximum of 36 months.

This plank is wordy. For example:

  • "Upgrading" and "modernizing" are the same thing.
  • Vehicles are a type of equipment.
  • Something that is safe and efficient is also effective.